108 Prāṇāyāma Practice Pointers – 49 – Āsana which lengthen the front of the body…

Āsana which lengthen the front of the body
are at the service of the Pūraka
and the Antar Kumbhaka.

Āsana which lengthen the front of the body
are at the service of the Pūraka
and the Antar Kumbhaka.

From this, the role of Prāṇāyāma is to embrace all the
learned qualities of the breath in Āsana and Mudrā,
both in intensifying its energetic potentials, as well
as cultivating its inherent psychological qualities.

Hence, nearly all of the important components
in Prāṇāyāma can be previously introduced,
and thus extensively explored, through the
various facets of Āsana and Mudrā practice.
Nevertheless, the relationship of
Āsana with Prāṇāyāma should be
in alignment with the purpose that
is within Kriyā Yoga, as in the effect
of Samādhi Bhāvana on Tanū Kleśa.

Although sometimes, in specific situations,
another Āsana can serve within a short term
need, or in a substitute role, for Prāṇāyāma.

Furthermore, some Āsana have no direct
or indirect relationship with Prāṇāyāma.
They serve other Āsana within roles such as
a transitional bridge between categories, for
example from standing Āsana to prone Āsana.
Or, to forge a link between contrasting Āsana.
Or, to serve as a Pratikriyāsana or counterpose.

Equally, some Āsana directly
prepare for the Prāṇāyāma,
whilst some Āsana indirectly
prepare for the Prāṇāyāma.

Though some Āsana are
particularly reserved for
the practice of Prāṇāyāma.

According to Aṣṭāṅga Yoga,
Āsana is a dynamic or static
position of the body and its role
is to prepare for and enhance
the practice of Prāṇāyāma.

Prāṇāyāma is where the
breath controls the mind,
rather than the mind
controlling the breath.
Kapālabhāti is a technique emphasising
a rapid, upper abdominal breathing,
with equal pressure on both the inhale
and the exhale through both nostrils.
It is generally classified as a Kriyā.
So it is applied on its own as a Kriyā,
either before the practice of Āsana,
or, as a Kriyā added to specific Āsana,
or within the practice of Mahāmudrā,
or a seated preliminary before Prāṇāyāma,
or as a learning step towards Bhastrikā.
Viloma Ujjāyī can be seen in todays Yoga environment
more as a stimulating, or as a Bṛṃhaṇa Kriyā technique.
Here the use of a single channel, only on the inhale, has
a potential to sharpen the individual practitioners focus.
Though for some, the casual application of this unique
sharpening process, as if a general use Prāṇāyāma, can
express itself accumulatively, as if an over-stimulation.
One role for a staged descent
within a Prāṇāyāma practice,
in terms of ratio and length,
is to offer a receptive space to
reveal any side effects of effort.
Here it can be actually more
difficult to step down gradually
in stages rather than just stopping.
Thus a subtle mirror in the descent
can reveal any stress in the ascent.

As an adjunct or extension to the Āsana element of a practice,
Prāṇāyāma can be applied to either enhance, stabilise or reduce
the impact of accumulative effects arising from the Āsana element.
The skill is being able to choose which is appropriate for that day,
in relation to where we are coming from in terms of that day’s Āsana,
and our personal choices as to where we are going to need to be after.
Is the primary obstacle to
experiencing Prāṇāyāma as a
developmental process, coming
from what arises within the mind,
rather than from within the breath?
Exploring Prāṇāyāma as Prāṇāyāma within
Śikṣaṇa Krama requires a mastery of the inhale.
For that using Viloma Ujjāyī is recommended.
It is a short-term technique taught specifically
to develop and refine the inhale as a preparation
for working with long-term bi-channel techniques
such as with Nāḍī Śodhana and Sūrya Bhedana.
What can define a transition between
Cikitsā Krama, Rakṣaṇa Krama and
Śikṣaṇa Krama in terms of Prāṇāyāma?
Is it that in Cikitsā Krama, the priority is
establishing an Āsana practice with the aim
of developing a core relationship with Ujjāyī?
Whereas, in Rakṣaṇa Krama, the priority is
establishing a Prāṇāyāma practice with the aim
of developing a core relationship, primarily
with Anuloma and secondarily with Pratiloma?
Whereas, in Śikṣaṇa Krama, the priority is
developing a core relationship, primarily with
Nāḍī Śodhana and secondarily with Sūrya Bhedana?

What can define a transition between
Cikitsā Krama, Rakṣaṇa Krama and
Śikṣaṇa Krama in terms of the breath?
Is it that in Cikitsā Krama, the priority is
within Āsana practice and establishing a
core relationship with using the breath?
Whereas, in Rakṣaṇa Krama, the priority
is within Āsana practice, and developing
the core relationship, primarily with the
exhale and secondarily with the inhale?
Whereas, in Śikṣaṇa Krama, the priority is
within Prāṇāyāma practice, and developing
the core relationship, primarily with the exhale
and the inhale, and secondarily with the holds?
In order to access its inner dimensions,
I feel Prāṇāyāma needs to be sustained,
in terms of both frequency, consistency and
competence, rather than it being a sporadic,
or perhaps nominal foray, into its potential as
a primary tool within Bāhya Aṅga Sādhana.
Maybe this is because of insufficient interest
in a long-term exploration into Prāṇāyāma?
On this point, one might offer observations
on the environment and expectations within
which the styling of modern group classes
are framed, seemingly ‘posing’ as if ‘Yoga’?
Or, perhaps because this cursory glance at its
form and function arises from us just looking
for nominal, immediate or even external fruits?
As one might with Āsana, when experiencing
a structural, energetic or psychological issue?